Wright v. Irish (Hudson Valley Clean Energy, Inc.)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
November 7, 2014

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,691 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3674 Semiconductors and Related Devices
334413 Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing
judicial dissolution
goodwill, income approach, bizcomps, discount for lack of marketability (DLOM), discounted cash flow (DCF), market approach, minority shareholder, growth rate, guideline publicly-traded company method, new york blc, equity value, growth projections, solar energy
Wright v. Irish (Hudson Valley Clean Energy, Inc.)
2014 N.Y. Sup. Ct. Index No. 2111/2014
US
State Court
New York
Supreme Court
Greg Scheig (petitioner); Wayne Day (respondent)
Forman

Summary

Court discredits respondent expert’s capitalization of earnings calculation and market-based analysis, noting “severe deficiencies” and instead adopts petitioner expert’s valuation but applies DLOM to entire equity value, not just goodwill.
Wright v. Irish (Hudson Valley Clean Energy, Inc.)
PDF, Size: 399 KB

See Also

Expert’s Solid DCF and Industry Research Sway Court

Legal and Court Case Update
January 2015

Court discredits respondent expert’s capitalization of earnings calculation and market-based analysis, noting “severe deficiencies” and instead adopts petitioner expert’s valuation but applies DLOM to entire equity value, not just goodwill.

This article also appears in:
BVR Guide to Management Projections and Business Valuation: Analysis and Case Law