Wojdak v. Greater Philadelphia Cablevision, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
January 7, 1998

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (5,922 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4841 Cable and Other Pay Television Services
515210 Cable and Other Subscription Programming
judicial dissolution
fair market value (FMV), partnership dissolution
Wojdak v. Greater Philadelphia Cablevision, Inc.
550 Pa. 474, 707 A.2d 214, 1998 Pa. LEXIS 12
US
State Court
Pennsylvania
Supreme Court
Andrew J. Armstrong (jointly retained)
Zappala

Summary

Issue was whether ex parte communications with third parties by an arbitrator constituted undue means and invalidated the arbitrator's award.

See Also

Ex Parte Communications Invalidate Arbitrator's Award

Legal and Court Case Update
March 1998

At issue is whether ex parte communication by an appraiser in determining a combined minority and marketability discount constituted "undue means" and therefore invalidated the use of the discounts in reaching the valuation conclusion.