Wallace v. Kalniz

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
July 5, 2013

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (6,455 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8021 Offices and Clinics of Dentists
621210 Offices of Dentists
economic damages & lost profits
damages, expert testimony, discounted cash flow (DCF), rule 702
Wallace v. Kalniz
2013 Ohio App. LEXIS 2987
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Dr. Malcolm Cohen (plaintiff); unknown (defendants)
Jensen

Summary

Appellate court affirms pretrial decision to strike economist expert’s opinion as to business loss under Rule 702; although the trial court erred when it found the expert unqualified to perform a business valuation, it was right to find his calculations ...
Wallace v. Kalniz
PDF, Size: 52 KB

See Also

Expert’s Anemic Analysis Imperils Damage Calculation

Legal and Court Case Update
October 2013

Appellate court affirms pretrial decision to strike economist expert’s opinion as to business loss under Rule 702; although the trial court erred when it found the expert unqualified to perform a business valuation, it was right to find his calculations ...

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Business Valuation in Healthcare Case Law Compendium