Vivid, Inc. v. Fiedler

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
July 2, 1998

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (11,037 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7312 Outdoor Advertising Services
541850 Indoor and Outdoor Display Advertising
condemnation
Vivid, Inc. v. Fiedler
219 Wis. 2d 764, 580 N.W.2d 644, 1998 Wisc. LEXIS 86
US
State Court
Wisconsin
Supreme Court
Abrahamson

Summary

Issue was the proper method of valuation in condemnation proceedings.

See Also

Vivid Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation

Legal and Court Case Update
August 1998

State argues that the market approach using the gross income multiplier to value the condemnation of outdoor advertising signs is an invalid valuation method as a matter of law because noncompensable business profits are inextricably intertwined with the valuation.