VirnetX, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (II)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 16, 2014

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (11,929 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4899 Communications Services, NEC
541512 Computer Systems Design Services
intellectual property
patent infringement, royalty rate, expert testimony, apple, reasonable royalty, royalty base, smallest salable unit, nash bargaining solution
VirnetX, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (II)
2014 U.S. LEXIS 17748
US
Federal Court
Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Roy Weinstein (plaintiff); unknown (defendant)
Prost (Chief Judge as of May 2014)

Summary

Federal Circuit strikes award against Apple, finding it resulted from district court’s misstating the law on the entire market value rule and apportionment and court’s failure to serve as gatekeeper under Daubert and exclude unreliable damages testimony.
VirnetX, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (II)
PDF, Size: 234 KB

See Also

EMVR Must Not Swallow Apportionment, Federal Circuit Says

Legal and Court Case Update
November 2014

Federal Circuit strikes award against Apple, finding it resulted from district court’s misstating the law on the entire market value rule and apportionment and court’s failure to serve as gatekeeper under Daubert and exclude unreliable damages testimony.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Second Edition