U.S. Salt, Inc. v. Broken Arrow, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
May 30, 2008

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,132 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
2099 Food Preparations, NEC
311942 Spice and Extract Manufacturing
economic damages & lost profits
damages, breach of contract, daubert, expert testimony, economic damages & lost profits
U.S. Salt, Inc. v. Broken Arrow, Inc.
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43376; 2008 WL 2277602
US
Federal Court
Minnesota
United States District Court
Amy R. Mason, Daniel N. Sacco, Evon M. Spangler, Perry M. de Stefano, Wallace G. Hilke
Arthur H. Cobb (defendant); plaintiff unspecified
Kyle

Summary

Lost profits calculations, based exclusively on management projections, called into question by U.S. District Court.
U.S. Salt, Inc. v. Broken Arrow, Inc.
PDF, Size: 57 KB

See Also

Are Damages Opinions Based ‘Almost Exclusively’ on Management Opinions Too Unreliable?

Legal and Court Case Update
August 2008

Lost profits calculations, based exclusively on management projections, called into question by U.S. District Court.

This article also appears in:
BVR Guide to Management Projections and Business Valuation: Analysis and Case Law
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar