U.S. Renal Care v. Jaafar

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
December 8, 2010

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (6,888 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8011 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine
621111 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)
contract
U.S Renal Care v. Jaafar
2010 WL 3405831 (Tex. App.)
US
State Court
Texas
Court of Appeals
Gene Trevino (plaintiffs); Richard Robertson (defendants)
Simmons

Summary

Texas Court reverses $750,000 jury award for value of patient account receivables for lack of reliable expert evidence, including faulty assumptions and failure to review underlying patient and payer data.
U.S Renal Care v. Jaafar
PDF, Size: 492 KB

See Also

Analyzing Healthcare AR: Reviewing Underlying Patient Data Is Critical, Court Says

Legal and Court Case Update
November 2010

Texas Court reverses $750,000 jury award for value of patient account receivables for lack of reliable expert evidence, including faulty assumptions and failure to review underlying patient and payer data.

This article also appears in:
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar
Business Valuation in Healthcare Case Law Compendium