The Citrilite Co. v. Cott Beverages, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
January 25, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (4,265 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
2086 Bottled and Canned Soft Drinks and Carbonated Waters
312111 Soft Drink Manufacturing
contract
calculating damages, damages, regression analysis, economic damages & lost profits
The Citrilite Co. v. Cott Beverages, Inc.
2011 WL 284915 (E.D. Cal.)
US
Federal Court
California
United States District Court
John Carson and Thomas Neches (plaintiff); Dr. Randolph E. Bucklin (defendant)
Wanger

Summary

Court upholds regression analysis of cumulative data sets under Daubert but strikes portions of expert’s damages calculations that project lost profits beyond stated contract term.
The Citrilite Co. v. Cott Beverages, Inc.
PDF, Size: 126 KB

See Also

Regression Analysis of Cumulative Data Sets Unreliable Under Daubert?

Legal and Court Case Update
May 2011

Court upholds regression analysis of cumulative data sets under Daubert but strikes portions of expert’s damages calculations that project lost profits beyond stated contract term.

This article also appears in:
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar