Stocker v. Stocker

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
November 6, 2017

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,367 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5999 Miscellaneous Retail Stores, NEC
453998 All Other Miscellaneous Store Retailers (except Tobacco Stores)
marital dissolution/divorce
expert testimony, income approach, asset approach, bizcomps, cash flow, fair market value (FMV), marital asset, market approach, equitable distribution, willing buyer
Stocker v. Stocker
2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 4834
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Mark Hoge (husband); Sam Robinson (wife)
Shaw

Summary

Trial court did not err in adopting income-based valuation offered by husband’s expert; appeals court calls husband’s attack on his own expert “counterintuitive” where expert explained the value of the company was in its cash flow rather than its assets.
Stocker v Stocker
PDF, Size: 40 KB

See Also

Court Rebuffs Litigant’s Attack on Own Expert’s Income-Based Valuation

Court Case Digests
November 6, 2017

Trial court did not err in adopting income-based valuation offered by husband’s expert; appeals court calls husband’s attack on his own expert “counterintuitive” where expert explained the value of the company was in its cash flow rather than its assets.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition