Stadtmueller v. Fitzgerald (In re Epic Cycle Interactive, Inc.)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
June 6, 2014

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (8,622 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7373 Computer Integrated Systems Design
541512 Computer Systems Design Services
bankruptcy
goodwill, expert testimony, intangible assets, discount, liquidation, solvency, book value, bankruptcy code, avoidable transfer, chapter 7 bankruptcy, going concern value
Stadtmueller v. Fitzgerald (In re Epic Cycle Interactive, Inc.)
2014 Bank. LEXIS 2622
US
Federal Court
California
United States Bankruptcy Court
Alan Myers (trustee); Michael Corson (defendants)
Latham

Summary

Bankruptcy court finds expert’s analysis “blurred the line” between going concern and liquidation value, detracting from opinion’s credibility; but court approves of expert’s “precise” time frame for capturing data with which to determine solvency.
Stadtmueller v. Fitzgerald (In re Epic Cycle Interactive, Inc.)
PDF, Size: 663 KB

See Also

‘Blurred’ Solvency Analysis Diminishes Expert’s Credibility

Legal and Court Case Update
September 2014

Bankruptcy court finds expert’s analysis “blurred the line” between going concern and liquidation value, detracting from opinion’s credibility; but court approves of expert’s “precise” time frame for capturing data with which to determine solvency.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation & Bankruptcy Compendium, Third Edition