Square D. Company and Subsidiaries v. CIR

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 26, 2003

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (29,752 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
federal taxation
Square D. Company and Subsidiaries v. CIR
121 T.C. No. 11 (2003)
US
Federal Court
United States Tax Court
Arthur Rosenbloom <br> Pearl Meyer <br>
Gale

Summary

The full Tax Court considered how to measure reasonable compensation in relation to golden parachute payments for sec. 280 (G) purposes. The Tax Court determined the multifactor test was the more appropriate than the independent investor test under this s ...
Square D. Company and Subsidiaries v. CIR
PDF, Size: 188 KB

See Also

Deduction of Golden Parachute Payments as Compensation Limited by Sec. 280G

Legal and Court Case Update
September 26, 2003

The full Tax Court considered how to measure reasonable compensation in relation to golden parachute payments for sec. 280 (G) purposes.