Siker v. Siker

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
February 18, 1999

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (5,487 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5712 Furniture Stores
442110 Furniture Stores
marital dissolution/divorce
fair market value (FMV)
Siker v. Siker
593 N.W.2d 830,1999 Wisc. App
US
State Court
Wisconsin
Court of Appeals
Reginald Emshoff (for husband); Dennis Mahoney (for wife)
Deininger

Summary

At issue is the valuation of husband's furniture business.

See Also

Purchase From Brother Not Indicative of Value

Legal and Court Case Update
June 1999

One of the primary issues in the trial of this marital dissolution was the valuation of husband's 90.5% interest in a furniture business for property division purposes. The trial court found ...

Prevaluation Date Transaction Between Brothers Is Not Indicative of Value

Legal and Court Case Update
February 18, 1999

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's valuation of the parties' furniture business in 1998. The lower court determined that a pre-valuation date redemption of the husband's brother's interest in the business was not probative. It furth ...