Showell v. Pusey

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 1, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,741 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8721 Accounting, Auditing, and Bookkeeping Services
judicial dissolution
Showell v. Pusey
2011 WL 3860419 (Del. Ch.)
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Jennings P. Hastings (plaintiff); Clyde G. Hartman (defendant)
Glasscock

Summary

Delaware Chancery Court resolves ambiguities in CPA firm operating agreement to find that its provisions for liquidation value, rather than statutory fair value as a going concern, control buy-out price for retiring partner.
Showell v. Pusey
PDF, Size: 65 KB

See Also

Do CPA Firm Agreements Trump Statutory FV Value of Retiring Partner’s Shares?

Legal and Court Case Update
November 2011

Delaware Chancery Court resolves ambiguities in CPA firm operating agreement to find that its provisions for liquidation value, rather than statutory fair value as a going concern, control buyout price for retiring partner.

This article also appears in:
Valuation Cases From the Delaware Court of Chancery Show How to Excel