Settele v. Settele

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 15, 2015

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (5,834 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8021 Offices and Clinics of Dentists
621210 Offices of Dentists
marital dissolution/divorce
divorce, expert testimony, income approach, asset approach, capitalization of earnings, double dip, accounts receivable, future income, double counting
Settele v. Settele
2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3629
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Richard Ferguson (husband); Brian A. Russell (wife)
Sadler

Summary

Appeals court rejects claim that accounts receivable used in asset-based business valuation by wife’s expert are analogous to future income stream for purposes of arguing double dip in light of income determination for spousal support award.
Settele v. Settele
PDF, Size: 74 KB

See Also

Court Nixes Double-Dip Claim Based on Accounts Receivable Treatment

Legal and Court Case Update
December 2015

Appeals court rejects claim that accounts receivable used in asset-based business valuation by wife’s expert are analogous to future income stream for purposes of arguing double dip in light of income determination for spousal support award.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition
Business Valuation in Healthcare Case Law Compendium