SEC v. Bluepoint Inv. Counsel

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
May 24, 2022
6282 Investment Advice
523930 Investment Advice
securities litigation
SEC valuation standards, securities and exchange commission (SEC), motion to exclude, motion in limine

SEC v. Bluepoint Inv. Counsel
2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92776; 2022 WL 1638790
US
Federal Court
Wisconsin
United States District Court
McMahon
William M. Conley

Summary

This case dealt with a suit by the SEC against the defendants for alleged violations of the Securities Act. The ruling digested here was a short ruling on motions in limine. The key motion considered here was a motion to exclude evidence of Amiran’s value not known by GTIF (a plaintiff’s entity) when valuations were prepared. The court denied the motion to exclude the SEC’s expert on the basis that she used information that was known or knowable. The court noted that her assumptions can be challenged on cross-examination.
SEC v. Bluepoint Inv. Counsel
PDF, Size: 109 KB

See Also

U.S. District Court Rules on Known or Knowable Issue and Allows Testimony of SEC Valuation Expert—Can Be Challenged on Cross-Examination

This case dealt with a suit by the SEC against the defendants for alleged violations of the Securities Act. The ruling digested here was a short ruling on motions in limine. The key motion considered here was a motion to exclude evidence of Amiran’s value not known by GTIF (a plaintiff’s entity) when valuations were prepared. The court denied the motion to exclude the SEC’s expert on the basis that she used information that was known or knowable. The court noted that her assumptions can be challenged on cross-examination.