S. Muoio & Co., LLC v. Hallmark Entertainment Investments

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 9, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (18,743 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
breach of fiduciary duty
S. Muoio & Co., LLC v. Hallmark Entertainment Investments
2011 WL 863007 (Del. Ch.)
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Daniel Schecter and Robert Hamada (plaintiffs); Christopher Lee and Jerry Hausman (defendants)
Chandler

Summary

Delaware Chancery urges experts to use “robust” “triangular” valuation approach, including DCF, comparable companies, and comparable transactions.
S. Muoio & Co., LLC v. Hallmark Entertainment Investments
PDF, Size: 312 KB

See Also

Delaware Chancery Advocates ‘Triangular’ Approach to Business Valuation

Legal and Court Case Update
June 2011

Delaware Chancery urges experts to use “robust” “triangular” valuation approach, including DCF, comparable companies, and comparable transactions.

This article also appears in:
BVR Guide to Management Projections and Business Valuation: Analysis and Case Law
Valuation Cases From the Delaware Court of Chancery Show How to Excel