Rowe v. DPI Specialty Foods

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 19, 2015

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (4,516 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5141 Groceries, General Line
445110 Supermarkets and Other Grocery Retailers (except Convenience Retailers)
economic damages & lost profits
damages, daubert, expert testimony, admissibility, causation, rule 702, earnings, reliability
Rowe v. DPI Specialty Foods
2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110605
US
Federal Court
Utah
United States District Court
Jeremy Sharpe (plaintiff); Derk G. Rasmussen (defendants)
Nuffer

Summary

Court excludes most of rebuttal opinion under Daubert, saying it is not “the product of reliable principles and methods” owing to expert’s “serious misconception of his role and misreading of the authorities he cites,” particularly with regard to causatio ...
Rowe v. DPI Specialty Foods
PDF, Size: 135 KB

See Also

Damages Opinion Reveals ‘Serious Misconception’ of Role of Expert

Legal and Court Case Update
November 2015

Court excludes most of rebuttal opinion under Daubert, saying it is not “the product of reliable principles and methods” owing to expert’s “serious misconception of his role and misreading of the authorities he cites,” particularly with regard to causatio ...

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition