Rowe v. DPI Specialty Foods

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 19, 2015
5141 Groceries, General Line
445110 Supermarkets and Other Grocery (except Convenience) Stores
economic damages & lost profits
damages, daubert, expert testimony, admissibility, causation, rule 702, earnings, reliability

Rowe v. DPI Specialty Foods
2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110605
US
Federal Court
Utah
United States District Court
Jeremy Sharpe (plaintiff); Derk G. Rasmussen (defendants)
Nuffer

Summary

Court excludes most of rebuttal opinion under Daubert, saying it is not “the product of reliable principles and methods” owing to expert’s “serious misconception of his role and misreading of the authorities he cites,” particularly with regard to causatio ...
Rowe v. DPI Specialty Foods
PDF, Size: 135 KB

See Also

Damages Opinion Reveals ‘Serious Misconception’ of Role of Expert

Court excludes most of rebuttal opinion under Daubert, saying it is not “the product of reliable principles and methods” owing to expert’s “serious misconception of his role and misreading of the authorities he cites,” particularly with regard to causatio ...