Rohling v. Rohling

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
June 1, 2018

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (12,002 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8072 Dental Laboratories
339116 Dental Laboratories
marital dissolution/divorce
expert testimony, calculation of value, capitalization of earnings, limited liability company, rule 702, SSVS-1, reliability, valuation report, engagement letter, expert qualifications
Rohling v. Rohling
266 So. 3d 51 (Ala. Civ. App. 2018)
US
State Court
Alabama
Court of Civil Appeals
None (husband); Jeremy Blackburn (wife)
Pittman

Summary

Appeals court rejects claim that expert’s value determination pursuant to a calculation engagement rather than a valuation engagement was unreliable; trial court properly considered limitations inherent in a calculation engagement when crediting expert’s value estimate, appeals court says.
Rohling v Rohling
PDF, Size: 180 KB

See Also

Appeals Court Validates Trial Court’s Reliance on Calculation of Value

Court Case Digests
June 1, 2018

Appeals court rejects claim that expert’s value determination pursuant to a calculation engagement rather than a valuation engagement was unreliable; trial court properly considered limitations inherent in a calculation engagement when crediting expert’s value estimate, appeals court says.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition