Robert Haff, et al. v. Richard Augeson D/BA/ Hubbard Concrete Pumping, et al.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
April 22, 2003

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,469 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
1771 Concrete Work
238110 Poured Concrete Foundation and Structure Contractors
contract
Robert Haff, et al. v. Richard Augeson D/BA/ Hubbard Concrete Pumping, et al.
No. C1-02-1652 (Minn. App. 2003), unpublished
US
State Court
Minnesota
Court of Appeals
Hudson

Summary

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court’s use of pre-breach average monthly income when establishing the lost profits of a new business. It rejected the company’s argument that the estimated post-breach income the company would have earned b ...
Robert Haff, et al. v. Richard Augeson D/BA/ Hubbard Concrete Pumping, et al.
PDF, Size: 37 KB

See Also

Lost Profits Established Using Average Prebreach Monthly Income

Legal and Court Case Update
April 22, 2003

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court’s use of prebreach average monthly income when establishing the lost profits of a new business.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition