RMD, LLC v. Nitto Americas, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
November 5, 2012

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (6,626 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3714 Motor Vehicle Parts and Accessories
contract
lost profits, breach of contract, daubert, economic damages & lost profits
RMD, LLC v. Nitto Americas, Inc.
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158107
US
Federal Court
Kansas
United States District Court
Marc Vianello (plaintiff); Christopher Pflaum, George McCollister (defendants)
Robinson

Summary

Federal district court finds plaintiff’s expert’s Crystal Ball and Holt Winters methodology to project lost profits admissible under Daubert; method proved reasonable when subsequently tested with regression analysis tool.
RMD, LLC v. Nitto Americas, Inc.
PDF, Size: 50 KB

See Also

Expert’s Unconventional Method to Forecast Lost Profits Satisfies Daubert

Legal and Court Case Update
February 2013

Federal district court finds plaintiff’s expert’s Crystal Ball and Holt Winters methodology to project lost profits admissible under Daubert; method proved reasonable when subsequently tested with regression analysis tool.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar