RMD, LLC v. Nitto Americas, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
November 5, 2012
3714 Motor Vehicle Parts and Accessories
contract
lost profits, breach of contract, daubert, economic damages & lost profits

RMD, LLC v. Nitto Americas, Inc.
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158107
US
Federal Court
Kansas
United States District Court
Marc Vianello (plaintiff); Christopher Pflaum, George McCollister (defendants)
Robinson

Summary

Federal district court finds plaintiff’s expert’s Crystal Ball and Holt Winters methodology to project lost profits admissible under Daubert; method proved reasonable when subsequently tested with regression analysis tool.
RMD, LLC v. Nitto Americas, Inc.
PDF, Size: 50 KB

See Also

Expert’s Unconventional Method to Forecast Lost Profits Satisfies Daubert

Federal district court finds plaintiff’s expert’s Crystal Ball and Holt Winters methodology to project lost profits admissible under Daubert; method proved reasonable when subsequently tested with regression analysis tool.

This article also appears in:
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar