Rigel Corporation v. Gregory S. Cutchall

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
February 4, 1994

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (4,327 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5812 Eating and Drinking Places
722511 Full-Service Restaurants
shareholder dissent/oppression
fair value
Rigel Corporation v. Gregory S. Cutchall
511 N.W.2d 519,1994 Neb. LEXIS 27
US
State Court
Nebraska
Supreme Court
Caporale

Summary

At issue is the fair value, including interest, of the shares of common stock held by the defendant-appellant.

See Also

Rigel Corp. v. Cutchall

Legal and Court Case Update
February 4, 1994

The plaintiff, Rigel Corp., brought this action under Nebraska dissenting shareholder statutes seeking a determination of the fair value of defendant stockholder’s 20% interest in Rigel/Chix Inc., a corporation that was merged into Rigel.