Gesoff v. IIC Industries Inc., et al.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
May 18, 2006

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (18,666 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6719 Offices of Holding Companies, NEC
551112 Offices of Other Holding Companies
shareholder dissent/oppression
economic damages & lost profits
Gesoff v. IIC Industries Inc., et al.
No. 19473 (Del. Chan. 2006)
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Jessica Zeldin
David N. Fuller, ASA, Neil J. Beaton
Lamb

Summary

The Delaware Court of Chancery determined that a company-specific risk premium should not be added when computing the cost of capital when there is no financial analysis supporting the company-specific risk. Furthermore, the court held that a small stock ...
Richard S. Gesoff v. IIC Industries Inc.
PDF, Size: 154 KB

See Also

‘9/11 Defense’ Fails to Justify Unfair Merger

Legal and Court Case Update
September 2006

A “9/11 defense” fails to obviate unfair merger price, and valuation highlights difficulties inherent in assessing specific and small-company risk in overseas markets.

Small-Stock and Company-Specific Risk Premia Considered in Fair Value Analysis

Legal and Court Case Update
May 18, 2006

The Delaware Court of Chancery determined that a company-specific risk premium should not be added when computing the cost of capital when there is no financial analysis supporting the company-specific risk. Furthermore, the court held that a small stock ...

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Valuation Cases From the Delaware Court of Chancery Show How to Excel