Summary
The Alaska Supreme Court held that a put-and-call option buy-sell agreement must be symmetrical such that the price proposed by the offeror will be the same whether he buys or sells under that agreement. Therefore, it held that the inclusion of non-moneta ...
Richard Harris v. AHTNA, Inc.
PDF, Size: 115 KB
See Also
Alaska Supreme Court Considered a Put-and-Call Option in a Buy-Sell Agreement
The Alaska Supreme Court held that a put-and-call option buy-sell agreement must be symmetrical such that the price the offeror proposed will be the same whether he buys or sells under that agreement.