Pro Finish USA, Ltd. v. Johnson

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
February 6, 2003

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (6,068 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
2844 Perfumes, Cosmetics, and Other Toilet Preparations
325620 Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
shareholder dissent/oppression
Pro Finish USA, Ltd. v. Johnson
63 P.3d 288, 2003 Ariz. App. LEXIS 16
US
State Court
Arizona
Court of Appeals
Stephen K. Clarke, CPA/ABV (for dissenting stockholders)<br>James A. Larson (for Pro Finish)
Lankford

Summary

In this case of first impression under the Arizona dissenters' rights statute, the corporation appealed a trial court ruling accepting the dissenting shareholders' expert's conclusion of fai ...
Pro Finish USA, Ltd. v. Johnson
PDF, Size: 504 KB

See Also

Fair Value Is Pro Rata Share of Sale Price in Arm's-Length Asset Sale

Legal and Court Case Update
April 2003

In this case of first impression under the Arizona dissenters' rights statute, the corporation appealed a trial court ruling accepting the dissenting shareholders' expert's conclusion of fair value over that of the corporation's expert.