Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int’l, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
July 3, 2018

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (6,824 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3699 Electrical Machinery, Equipment, and Supplies, NEC
335999 All Other Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and Component Manufacturing
intellectual property
royalty rate, reasonable royalty, royalty base, apportionment, patent, entire market value rule (EMVR)
Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int’l, Inc.
2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 26842
US
Federal Court
Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Dr. Jonathan Putnam (plaintiff); James Malackowski (defendant)
Dyk

Summary

Federal Circuit clarifies EMVR applicability in calculating reasonable royalty related to a multicomponent, infringing product that contains other valuable nonpatented features; court explains how the patent holder must show that the patented feature was the sole driver of consumer demand.
Power Integrations v Fairchild
PDF, Size: 155 KB

See Also

Federal Circuit Sharpens EMVR Test Applicable to Multicomponent Products

Court Case Digests
July 3, 2018

Federal Circuit clarifies EMVR applicability in calculating reasonable royalty related to a multicomponent, infringing product that contains other valuable nonpatented features; court explains how the patent holder must show that the patented feature was the sole driver of consumer demand.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition