Pike v. Tex. EMC Mgmt., LLC

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
June 7, 2017

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,598 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3241 Cement, Hydraulic
327310 Cement Manufacturing
economic damages & lost profits
trade secret, expert testimony, admissibility, economic damages & lost profits, reliability, interference, projections, asset sale, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization (EBITDA), reasonable certainty, lost business value
Pike v. Tex. EMC Mgmt., LLC
2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 5217
US
State Court
Texas
Court of Appeals
Lygren [first name unknown], Paula Miller (plaintiffs); Todd Burchett (defendants)
Scoggins

Summary

In business tort case involving unprofitable entity trying to market a trade secret, court upholds damages award; experts’ EBITDA valuations were based on commonly used method and numerous data sources, and experts linked data to conclusions, court says.
Pike v. Tex. EMC Mgmt., LLC
PDF, Size: 872 KB

See Also

Majority Says EBITDA Valuations Buttress Damages Award

Court Case Digests
June 7, 2017

In business tort case involving unprofitable entity trying to market a trade secret, court upholds damages award; experts’ EBITDA valuations were based on commonly used method and numerous data sources, and experts linked data to conclusions, court says.

This article also appears in:
BVR Guide to Management Projections and Business Valuation: Analysis and Case Law