Peltz v. Hatten

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
June 5, 2002

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (21,192 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4813 Telephone Communications, Except Radiotelephone
517911 Telecommunications Resellers
bankruptcy
bankruptcy, discount rate, income approach, discounted cash flow (DCF), market approach, fraudulent transfer, growth rate
Peltz v. Hatten
279 B.R. 710, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10282
US
Federal Court
Delaware
United States District Court
Patrick Landry (for debtor) <br> Professor Colin Blaydon (for trustee) <br> Sharon Armbrust (for trustee) <br> Robert Ott (for trustee) <br> Keith Mallinson (for Hatten)
McKelvie

Summary

Adversarial proceeding in bankruptcy in which the liquidating trustee asserts fraudulent transfer of stock.

See Also

Bankruptcy Court Indicates Strong Preference for Market Approach, Price Per Subscriber Multiple

Legal and Court Case Update
December 2002

This trial court matter involves an adversarial proceeding in bankruptcy in which the liquidating trustee asserts that USN Communications,Inc.'s ("the debtor") purchase of Connecticut Telephone and Connecticut Mobilecom (CT Tel) stock from the Hatten sellers for $68 million was a fraudulent transfer.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation & Bankruptcy Compendium, Third Edition