Oudheusden v. Oudheusden (I)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
May 21, 2019
7379 Computer Related Services, NEC
541512 Computer Systems Design Services
marital dissolution/divorce
expert testimony, asset value, fair market value (FMV), spousal support, equitable distribution, sole proprietorship, future income, double counting, marital property, dissolution

Oudheusden v. Oudheusden (I)
190 Conn. App. 169; 209 A.3d 1282 (2019)
US
State Court
Connecticut
Appellate Court of Connecticut
James R. Guberman (wife); Mark S. Gottlieb (husband)
Alvord

Summary

Appellate court remands because of trial court’s impermissible double dipping, where trial court awarded wife half of the fair market value of husband’s two solely owned businesses, which represented husband’s sole income stream, and based spousal support on annual income generated by businesses.
Oudheusen v Oudheusen
PDF, Size: 138 KB

See Also

Connecticut Appellate Court Remands Because of Impermissible Double Dipping

Appellate court remands because of trial court’s impermissible double dipping, where trial court awarded wife half of the fair market value of husband’s two solely owned businesses, which represented husband’s sole income stream, and based spousal support on annual income generated by businesses.