Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc. (V)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
April 10, 2012

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,872 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7372 Prepackaged Software
511210 Software Publishers
intellectual property
economic damages & lost profits
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc. (V)
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 688; 2012 WL 1189898
US
Federal Court
California
United States District Court
James Kearl (court-appointed); Alan Cox (defendant)
Alsup

Summary

Federal district court strikes portions of its own expert’s report on patent damages for failing to apportion damages among the patented and unpatented features of the in-suit IP.
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc. (V)
PDF, Size: 48 KB

See Also

Federal Court Strikes Portions of Its Own Expert’s Report

Legal and Court Case Update
June 2012

Last year, when a federal district judge (William Alsup) couldn’t convince the parties to select (and pay for) an independent expert, he enlisted the court’s powers under Rule 706 FRE to appoint an economics professor to calculate damages.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar