O’Rourke v. Burke and Hotchkiss

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 6, 2013

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,617 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
2051 Bread and Other Bakery Products, Except Cookies and Crackers
311812 Commercial Bakeries
malpractice (legal)
O’Rourke v. Burke and Hotchkiss
2013 N.H. Super. LEXIS 4
US
State Court
New Hampshire
Superior Court
Earnest Tyler (plaintiff); unknown (defendant)
McNamara

Summary

In Daubert ruling, state court excludes valuation the expert claimed was based on the going concern, or “Queenan” methodology; although a reliable method, it cannot be applied to the facts of the case in a reliable manner, considering the business never h ...
O’Rourke v. Burke and Hotchkiss
PDF, Size: 35 KB

See Also

Court Rejects Expert’s Use of Going Concern Method for Inactive Business

Legal and Court Case Update
June 2013

In Daubert ruling, state court excludes valuation the expert claimed was based on the going concern, or “Queenan” methodology; although a reliable method, it cannot be applied to the facts of the case in a reliable manner, considering the business never h ...

This article also appears in:
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar