Northeast Savings, F.A. v. United States

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
February 1, 2010

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (51,826 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6211 Security Brokers, Dealers, and Flotation Companies
523110 Investment Banking and Securities Dealing
winstar
Northeast Savings, F.A. v. United States
2010 WL 410110 (Fed. Cl.)
US
Federal Court
Federal
United States Court of Federal Claims
Amanda Tantum, Charles J Cooper, David Lehner, David H Thompson, Donna M Doblick, Elizabeth M Hosford, James C Martin, Michael W Kirk, Sameer Yerawadekar, Scott Austin, Tarek Sawi, Vincent J Colatriano
Nevins Baxter (plaintiff); Daniel Fischel, Anjan Thakor, and Barefoot Bankhead (defendant)
Williams

Summary

Court finds bank expert fails to prove federal legislation caused bank’s lost profits in breach of contract/Winstar case, when a variety of external and internal factors forced bank to shrink assets and divest risky portfolio.
Northeast Savings, F.A. v. United States
PDF, Size: 613 KB

See Also

Experts Face ‘Formidable Hurdle’ in Proving Lost Profits for Failed Banks

Legal and Court Case Update
May 2010

Court finds bank expert fails to prove federal legislation caused bank’s lost profits in breach of contract/Winstar case, when a variety of external and internal factors forced bank to shrink assets and divest risky portfolio.