Nieman v. Nieman

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
December 14, 2015

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (5,633 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8011 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine
621111 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)
marital dissolution/divorce
expert testimony, tax affecting, professional practice, noncompete agreement, equitable distribution, capital gains
Nieman v. Nieman
2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 5021
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Unknown (husband/plaintiff-appellee); Unknown (wife/defendant-appellant)
Shaw

Summary

Appeals court says consideration of tax consequences related to owner-spouse’s business is “too speculative” because owner has no plan to sell in near future; trial court improperly assumed current tax rates and business interests would remain constant.
Nieman v. Nieman
PDF, Size: 60 KB

See Also

Ohio Appeals Court Clarifies Provision on Tax Affecting at Divorce

Legal and Court Case Update
March 2016

Appeals court says consideration of tax consequences related to owner-spouse’s business is “too speculative” because owner has no plan to sell in near future; trial court improperly assumed current tax rates and business interests would remain constant.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition
Business Valuation in Healthcare Case Law Compendium