Natural Balance Pet Foods, Inc. v. Chenango Pet Foods, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 30, 2003

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,827 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
2047 Dog and Cat Food
311111 Dog and Cat Food Manufacturing
contract
Natural Balance Pet Foods, Inc. v. Chenango Pet Foods, Inc.
No. B162239 (Cal. App. 2 Dist. 2003), unpublished
US
State Court
California
Court of Appeal
Jennifer Polhemus <br>
Epstein

Summary

The California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, concluded that testimony from a forensic accountant as to the lost profits arising from a breach of contract were not speculative because the computation was based in part on management’s projections.
Natural Balance Pet Foods, Inc. v. Chenango Pet Foods, Inc.
PDF, Size: 145 KB

See Also

Lost Profits Based on Management Projections

Legal and Court Case Update
September 30, 2003

The California Court of Appeal, 2nd District, concluded that testimony from a forensic accountant as to the lost profits arising from a breach of contract were not speculative because the computation was based in part on management’s projections.

This article also appears in:
BVR Guide to Management Projections and Business Valuation: Analysis and Case Law