Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc., et al.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
October 21, 2003

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (2,081 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7941 Professional Sports Clubs and Promoters
711320 Promoters of Performing Arts, Sports, and Similar Events without Facilities
antitrust
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc., et al.
No. C4-02-530 (Minn. App. 2003), unpublished
US
State Court
Minnesota
Court of Appeals
Harten

Summary

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s grant of summary judgment that determined that the defendant did not violate any antitrust or tort laws when it competed with Motorsports and later bought the company.
Motorsports Racing Plus, Inc. v. Arctic Cat Sales, Inc., et al.
PDF, Size: 36 KB

See Also

CPA’s Report Found Insufficient to Support Antitrust Claim

Legal and Court Case Update
October 21, 2003

The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s grant of summary judgment that determined that the defendant did not violate any antitrust or tort laws when it competed with Motorsports and later bought the company. The appellate court agreed th ...