Montgomery Cellular Holding Co., Inc. v. Dobler

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 1, 2005

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (10,649 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4812 Radiotelephone Communications
517312 Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite)
shareholder dissent/oppression
control premium, weighted average cost of capital (WACC), appraisal action, discounted cash flow (DCF), minority discount, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization (EBITDA), guideline publicly-traded company method, comparable transactions method
Montgomery Cellular Holding Co., Inc. v. Dobler
2005 Del. LEXIS 295
US
State Court
Delaware
Supreme Court
Dawn M. Jones, Kenneth J. Nachbar, Laura C. Mow, Martin S. Lessner, Samuel T. Hirzel, Thomas J. Dougherty
Marc B. Sherman (for Dobler)<br>Kenneth D. Gartrell (for Montgomery)
Jacobs

Summary

Verizon Inc. had offered to buy MCHC’s majority holder, Palmer Wireless Holdings (Palmer), if Verizon’s initial public offering was successful and if Palmer could acquire 100% of the stock in all of the companies it held.
Montgomery Cellular Holding Co., Inc. v. Dobler
PDF, Size: 226 KB

See Also

Valuation Upheld Against Party That Fails to Use Independent Valuation Sources

Legal and Court Case Update
December 2005

Verizon Inc. had offered to buy MCHC’s majority holder, Palmer Wireless Holdings (Palmer), if Verizon’s initial public offering was successful and if Palmer could acquire 100% of the stock in all of the companies it held.

This article also appears in:
Valuation Cases From the Delaware Court of Chancery Show How to Excel