Monsanto v. Tidball

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
August 26, 2009

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these compendiums:
Already a subscriber or compendium owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,786 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5153 Grain and Field Beans
424510 Grain and Field Bean Merchant Wholesalers
intellectual property
Monsanto v. Tidball
2009 WL 2757047 (E.D. Mo.)
US
Federal Court
Missouri
United States District Court
Kelley Sill
Perry

Summary

Expert is disqualified from “saved seed” patent infringement case because she: disregarded federal precedent concerning the limits to reasonable royalties in such cases; lacked sufficient expertise; and was just excluded from testifying in a similar case.
Monsanto v. Tidball
PDF, Size: 94 KB

See Also

Expert Disqualified in Patent Damages Case is Challenged In Second, Similar Case

Legal and Court Case Update
December 2009

Expert is disqualified from “saved seed” patent infringement case because she: disregarded federal precedent concerning the limits to reasonable royalties in such cases; lacked sufficient expertise; and was just excluded from testifying in a similar case.

This article also appears in:
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Second Edition