Michael Alvarado v. Marshall S. Stander, et ux.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
November 4, 2004

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (6,588 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7941 Professional Sports Clubs and Promoters
711219 Other Spectator Sports
economic damages & lost profits
calculating damages, damages, future earnings
Michael Alvarado v. Marshall S. Stander, et ux.
No. 22332-9-III (Wash. App. 2004), unpublished
US
State Court
Washington
Court of Appeals
Elizabeth F. Baker, Garth Louis Dano, George M. Ahrend, Robert William Sealby, William A. Gilbert
Daniel Harper, CPA <br>
Schultheis

Summary

The Washington Court of Appeals affirmed the damages expert’s reliance upon the industry expert’s assessment of the injured party’s career when preparing his lost future earnings assessment.
Michael Alvarado v. Marshall S. Stander, et ux.
PDF, Size: 32 KB

See Also

CPA’s Lost Future Earnings Opinion May Be Based on Industry Expert’s Assessment of Injured Party’s Career

Legal and Court Case Update
November 4, 2004

The Washington Court of Appeals affirmed the damages expert’s reliance upon the industry expert’s assessment of the injured party’s career when preparing his lost future earnings assessment.