Metamining, Inc. v. Barnette

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
June 26, 2013

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (7,412 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
1221 Bituminous Coal and Lignite Surface Mining
212111 Bituminous Coal and Lignite Surface Mining
contract
daubert, expert testimony, income approach, discount, real property
Metamining, Inc. v. Barnette
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89446
US
Federal Court
Virginia
United States District Court
Roger Daugherty (plaintiff); unknown (defendants)
Jones

Summary

Court says federal law, that is Daubert, controls admissibility of expert testimony in federal court and rejects defendants’ claim that expert was unqualified under state law; but it finds the opinion inadmissible because it resulted from an approach that ...
Metamining, Inc. v. Barnette
PDF, Size: 121 KB

See Also

Expert’s ‘Invocation’ of Income Approach Does Not Save Valuation

Legal and Court Case Update
September 2013

Court says federal law, that is Daubert, controls admissibility of expert testimony in federal court and rejects defendants’ claim that expert was unqualified under state law; but it finds the opinion inadmissible because it resulted from an approach that ...