Mentor Graphics Corp. v. EVE-USA, Inc. (II)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 1, 2017

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,471 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7373 Computer Integrated Systems Design
541512 Computer Systems Design Services
intellectual property
lost profits, patent infringement, reasonable royalty, panduit, apportionment, entire market value rule (EMVR)
Mentor Graphics Corp. v. EVE-USA, Inc. (II)
2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16854
US
Federal Court
Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Unknown (plaintiff); unknown (defendants)
Per Curiam

Summary

Federal Circuit denies defendants’ request for rehearing en banc on issue of whether lost profits award was improper because calculation involving a multicomponent product required apportionment analysis in addition to satisfaction of Panduit factors.
Mentor Graphics Corp. v. EVE-USA Inc. (Mentor II)
PDF, Size: 131 KB

See Also

Infringer’s Call for Apportionment of Lost Profits Goes Unheeded

Court Case Digests
September 1, 2017

Federal Circuit denies defendants’ request for rehearing en banc on issue of whether lost profits award was improper because calculation involving a multicomponent product required apportionment analysis in addition to satisfaction of Panduit factors.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition