McNee v. McNee

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 14, 2017

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,032 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5093 Scrap and Waste Materials
423930 Recyclable Material Merchant Wholesalers
marital dissolution/divorce
expert testimony, capitalization of earnings, discounted cash flow analysis, appreciation, separate property, valuation methods, debt, net book value
McNee v. McNee
2017 Ohio App. 4033
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
William Leicht, Steve Higgins (husband/appellant); Kelly Bianco (wife/appellee)
Donofrio

Summary

Trial court did not err in classifying owner-spouse’s personal loan to his business during marriage as a marital asset, appeals court finds; loan could be seen as an increase in value of owner’s business or a debt owed to parties, appeals court says.
McNee v. McNee
PDF, Size: 74 KB

See Also

Different Theories Justify Classifying Loan to Business as Marital Asset

Court Case Digests
September 14, 2017

Trial court did not err in classifying owner-spouse’s personal loan to his business during marriage as a marital asset, appeals court finds; loan could be seen as an increase in value of owner’s business or a debt owed to parties, appeals court says.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium
Business Valuation in Divorce Case Law Compendium - Fifth Edition