Marshall v. Marshall

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
October 6, 2020
1521 General Contractors-Single-Family Houses
236115 New Single-Family Housing Construction (except For-Sale Builders)
marital dissolution/divorce
bizminer, expert testimony, reasonable compensation, child support, fair market value (FMV), s corporation, alimony, assets, income

Marshall v. Marshall
2020 Conn. App, LEXIS 294; 2020 WL 5886570
US
State Court
Connecticut
Appellate Court of Connecticut
John Kramer (plaintiff/husband); John M. Leask II (defendant/wife)
Alvord

Summary

On second review, appeals court says trial court satisfied task on remand; latter’s use of reasonable compensation calculation to establish income for alimony and child support purposes was in the spirit of parties’ agreement and was based on “entirely credible” testimony by husband’s BV expert.
Marshall v. Marshall02
PDF, Size: 131 KB

See Also

Courts Agree Reasonable Compensation Is Sound Method for Calculating Spousal Support in S Corp Context

On second review, appeals court says trial court satisfied task on remand; latter’s use of reasonable compensation calculation to establish income for alimony and child support purposes was in the spirit of parties’ agreement and was based on “entirely credible” testimony by husband’s BV expert.