Manpower, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania (II)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
April 11, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase.   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6300 Insurance carriers
524126 Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Carriers
economic damages & lost profits
calculating damages, expert testimony, economic damages & lost profits, forensic accounting, rule 702, growth rate, business interruption loss
Manpower, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania (II)
2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39285; 2011 WL 1356945
US
Federal Court
Wisconsin
United States District Court
Eric Sullivan
Adelman

Summary

Court declines to reconsider Daubert ruling, finding the expert failed to support his selection of the growth rate in lost profits calculations with reliable, guiding principles.
Manpower, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania (II)
PDF, Size: 87 KB

See Also

Expert’s ‘Judgment’ in Selecting Growth Rate Needs Proof of Guiding Principles

Legal and Court Case Update
August 2011

Court declines to reconsider Daubert ruling, finding the expert failed to support his selection of the growth rate in lost profits calculations with reliable, guiding principles.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition