M&W, Inc. v. Pacific Guardian Life Insurance Co.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
January 30, 1998

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (38 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6311 Life Insurance
524113 Direct Life Insurance Carriers
breach of fiduciary duty
M&W, Inc. v. Pacific Guardian Life Insurance Co.
88 Haw. 372, 966 P.2d 1098, 1998 Haw. App. LEXIS 5
US
State Court
Hawaii
Court of Appeals
Robert Reilly (for Pacific Guardian)
Burns

Summary

The Decision Previously Reported at this Citation has been Depublished and Withdrawn at the Request of the Court Order of Depublication Reported at: 1998 Haw. LEXIS 340.

See Also

Breach of Directors' Fiduciary Duty Gains Dissenters Expanded Remedy

Legal and Court Case Update
March 1998

The court in this case concluded that "the sole purpose of eliminating the minority stockholders" did not constitute a "proper business purpose" for a squeeze-out merger.