Luminara Worldwide, LLC v. Liown Elecs. Co.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
May 18, 2016

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (5,484 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3999 Manufacturing Industries, NEC
339999 All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing
intellectual property
lost profits, expert testimony, admissibility, discovery, expert report, panduit
Luminara Worldwide, LLC v. Liown Elecs. Co.
2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93348
US
Federal Court
Minnesota
United States District Court
Donald Gorowsky (plaintiff); unknown (defendants)
Noel

Summary

Court says background information in expert’s report is what Rule 26 has in mind in requiring statement of “the facts or data considered by the witness” in forming his opinion; court clarifies discovery rules to communication with nonreporting expert.
Luminara Worldwide, LLC v. Liown Elecs. Co.
PDF, Size: 43 KB

See Also

Court Clarifies Rule 26 Protection for ‘Reporting’ and ‘Non-Reporting’ Experts

Court Case Digests
May 18, 2016

Court says background information in expert’s report is what Rule 26 has in mind in requiring statement of “the facts or data considered by the witness” in forming his opinion; court clarifies discovery rules to communication with nonreporting expert.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition