Level 3 Communications v. Floyd

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 22, 2011

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (5,812 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
tort
Level 3 Communications v. Floyd
2011 WL 11000078 (M.D. Tenn.)
US
Federal Court
Tennessee
United States District Court
Gregory Schuelke (defendant)
Trauger

Summary

Federal district court precludes defendant’s expert from opining on the appropriateness of legal remedy (loss of use damages vs. lost profits), but admits his testimony criticizing the plaintiff’s loss of use calculus and proposing an alternative damage a ...
Level 3 Communications v. Floyd
PDF, Size: 55 KB

See Also

Plaintiff Claims CPA With No Telecom Experience Cannot Rebut Loss of Use Damages

Legal and Court Case Update
July 2011

Federal district court precludes defendant’s expert from opining on the appropriateness of legal remedy (loss of use damages vs. lost profits).

This article also appears in:
Daubert Challenges: The Courts Raise the Bar