Summary
Court considers whether an expert can rely on valid but aged report after routine destruction of underlying workpapers, and also whether the expert can supplement the report with information not available at the time of the original.
Lawton v. Bank of America Corp.
PDF, Size: 42 KB
See Also
Is Expert Valuation Still Valid After Routine Destruction of Underlying Workpapers?
Court considers whether an expert can rely on valid but aged report after routine destruction of underlying workpapers, and also whether the expert can supplement the report with information not available at the time of the original.