Koehler v. Netspend Holdings Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
May 21, 2013

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (17,580 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6153 Short-Term Business Credit Institutions, Except Agricultural
522320 Financial Transactions Processing, Reserve, and Clearinghouse Activities
shareholder dissent/oppression
discounted cash flow (DCF), dissenting shareholder, merger, fairness opinion, premium
Koehler v. Netspend Holdings Inc.
2013 Del. Ch. LEXIS 131
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Unknown (plaintiff); unknown (defendants)
Glasscock

Summary

Court agrees with plaintiff shareholder that the proposed merger was the result of a defective sale process that included the company board’s reliance on a weak fairness opinion with valuations that were “poor indicators” of the company’s value; the sale ...
Koehler v. Netspend Holdings Inc.
PDF, Size: 298 KB

See Also

DCF Valuation Meant to Underpin Fairness Opinion Upends It

Legal and Court Case Update
August 2013

Court agrees with plaintiff shareholder that the proposed merger was the result of a defective sale process that included the company board’s reliance on a weak fairness opinion with valuations that were “poor indicators” of the company’s value; the sale ...

This article also appears in:
Valuation Cases From the Delaware Court of Chancery Show How to Excel