Kelsey v. Kelsey

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
January 9, 1996

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,092 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8011 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine
621111 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)
marital dissolution/divorce
discounted cash flow (DCF)
Kelsey v. Kelsey
918 P.2d 1067
US
State Court
Arizona
Court of Appeals
Scott K. Stuart (for husband) Dennis R. Abold (for wife)
Noyes, Jr.

Summary

At issue is the valuation of husband's hair transplant business and the valuation of the marital community's interest in a partnership.

See Also

Hair transplant, like facelift, constitutes medical practice

Legal and Court Case Update
February 1996

Husbands expert, Scott K. Stuart , a CPA, opined that husband's hair transplant business was a medical practice, with a value of $275,000.

Business Requiring Medical License to Be Valued as a Medical Practice

Legal and Court Case Update
January 9, 1996

The Arizona Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the lower court's valuation of the husband's hair replacement practice.