Kardash v. Commissioner (I)

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
March 18, 2015

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (22,923 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5211 Lumber and Other Building Materials Dealers
444110 Home Centers
federal taxation
asset approach, discounted cash flow (DCF), fair market value (FMV), market approach, internal revenue code (IRC), tangible assets, guideline publicly-traded company method, comparable transactions method, transferee liability
Kardash v. Commissioner (i)
2015 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 69
US
Federal Court
Federal
United States Tax Court
Stanley A. Murphy (petitioners); Dr. Israel Shaked (IRS/respondent)
Goeke

Summary

In transferee liability case, solvency experts use gamut of valuation methods to establish when subject became insolvent; Tax Court does not endorse any one approach but appears to give nod to IRS market-based solvency analysis.
Kardash v. Commissioner
PDF, Size: 150 KB

See Also

Tax Court Tacitly Approves of IRS Solvency Assessment

Legal and Court Case Update
July 2015

In transferee liability case, solvency experts use gamut of valuation methods to establish when subject became insolvent; Tax Court does not endorse any one approach but appears to give nod to IRS market-based solvency analysis.