Joyce v. Armstrong Teasdale, LLP (II)

Full Text of Court Cases
September 26, 2012
7372 Prepackaged Software
511210 Software Publishers
intellectual property

Joyce v. Armstrong Teasdale, LLP (II)
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137905
Federal Court
United States District Court
Stephen Weeks (plaintiff)


Expert’s supplement report to comply with recent case law concerning sufficiency of proof to prove damages in patent cases fails for lack of qualitative evidence and comparable licenses.
Joyce v. Armstrong Teasdale, LLP (II)
PDF, Size: 39 KB

See Also

Patent Experts Have Limited Latitude to Comply With New Damages Standards

Expert’s present value calculus for patented software fails to meet post-trial federal decisions on evidentiary standards for proving damages in patent cases, but the court grants leave to “repair” the report to conform to new standards.